EDWARD HEATH WAS A PAEDOPHILE
AND THAT’S A FACT!
According to the police chief in charge of Operation Conifer (the police investigation in to allegations of child abuse by the former Conservative Prime Minister, Edward Heath) he WAS a paedophile and a protected one at that – even in death.
Matthew Parris once said that if Heath was a paedophile, then he (Parris) was an aardvark. Well, Matthew, it looks like YOU ARE a burrowing, insect-eating mammal with a long snout. And you’re also an aardvark.
When claims against Heath resurfaced (as they have many times before over the decades and swiftly glossed over) Lord Armstrong came out all guns blazing.
Armstrong claimed that Heath was ‘asexual’, wasn’t able to drive, didn’t have his own car and always had a driver. Well, well, Lord A, it seems your doddery old memory has failed you because:
- His victims know differently;
- Not only is there photographic evidence of Heath driving, but the police also discovered he had a driving licence and owned a car – a Rover 2000 – which he purchased in 1975.
- Chauffeurs and drivers are employed to do just that – keep their eyes on the road, be invisible, discreet and prompt – not question their employers or passengers. They follow orders.
It may also have escaped your notice Lord A, but one of Heath’s drivers was in fact Niven James Sinclair who was also a depraved predatory paedophile and who went on to work for the BBC for three decades! You can read more about him in a great blog post by Cathy Fox (lifted by The Mirror, who then tried to pass off the investigation as their own).
And finally, Lord A, you may want to recalibrate your nonce radar considering you knew about Peter Hayman’s predilection for little boys and did nothing about it, you knew about Savile and you knew about Brittan. You were also wheeled out in order to try and suppress the publication of Spycatcher. It seems Lord A is the go-to man, much like the chief whip Tim Fortescue who also served under Heath, and who later admitted on camera that they were used to cover up MP’s indiscretions involving “small boys”.
Today’s article appears in the Fail on Sunday, so I am always extremely sceptical as to their motives. I believe this article has been produced in order to give the media time to hang, draw and quarter Chief Constable Mike Veale before he releases his proposed report in June. It will be interesting to see what happens over the next few months. Either this is the case, or they are hanging Heath out to dry in order to save others…
Operation Conifer – Wiltshire Police
Chief Constable Veale is 120% certain that allegations against Heath are true. At least 30 different witnesses have come forward with ‘strikingly similar allegations’ despite not knowing one another. It is also claimed that he believes that a cover up has been undertaken in the past over allegations against Heath.
In pursuit of the truth, Wiltshire Police have been able to discredit Lord Armstrong’s claims and have acted with integrity towards victims. One of those victims who speaks openly on Twitter has pleaded with the Metropolitan Police to follow suit and contact him, but they have failed to do so. He sadly knows a lot about Heath due to his time living on the streets of London in the 1960s. His is a primary source – a first hand witness – and the inertia by the Metropolitan Police is inexcusable.
Needless to say, the article today is a double-edged sword. It can’t help sticking the knife in to Operation Midland yet again, and it’s backhanded comments regarding claims made by ‘Nick’ and pointing out that so far it has cost £1m. What price a persons life? Those who never made it due to the unbearable effect the abuse had on their mental health are worth every penny. Those who survived by suffer hideous flashbacks are worth every penny.
I won’t link through to the Fail on Sunday because it’s not something I wish to associate with. I have, however, pasted the text of the article here.
The police chief investigating claims that Sir Edward Heath was a paedophile is convinced the allegations are ‘120 per cent’ genuine, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.
More than 30 people have come forward with claims of sexual abuse by the former Conservative Prime Minister, according to well-placed sources.
And they are said to have given ‘strikingly similar’ accounts of incidents to Wiltshire Police – even though the individuals are not known to each other.
The Mail on Sunday has been told that Wiltshire Chief Constable Mike Veale regards the allegations as ‘totally convincing’, and plans to publish a report in June.
Detectives have established that, contrary to claims that Sir Edward could not have committed the crimes as he ‘never drove a car’ and ‘always’ had a police driver with him, he did drive – and did have a car.
They have photographic evidence that shows he is a driver, and have established that he had a driving licence. He also bought a Rover 2000 after being deposed as Tory leader by Margaret Thatcher in 1975, when he was 58.
Astonishingly, Mr Veale is also understood to support claims that Sir Edward’s alleged crimes were reported to police years ago but covered up by the Establishment.
Some of those who said Sir Edward abused them are believed to have told police they went on to commit sexual abuse crimes themselves as a result.
The investigation into Sir Edward, called Operation Conifer, was set up in 2015 in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal.
Mr Veale came under pressure to abandon the inquiry last year after separate claims of a paedophile ring at Westminster involving former Home Secretary, the late Lord Brittan, and former Defence chief, Lord Bramall, were found to be groundless.
Allegations that Sir Edward was involved in satanic orgies have been dismissed as fantasy by an expert asked to review the case.
However, The Mail on Sunday has been told that Mr Veale believes the paedophile allegations are genuine. A source said: ‘Mr Veale believes in them 120 per cent and thinks they are totally convincing.
‘There are very close similarities in the accounts given by those who have come forward. The same names used for him, the same places and same type of incidents keep coming up.
‘What stands out is that the people giving these accounts are not connected but the stories and the details dovetail.
‘It contains disturbing stuff. Investigators have been shocked by what they have learned.’
Another source said: ‘The police were initially sceptical about the allegations, but now believe them. And they have come round to the view that they were covered up in the past because of who Heath was.
‘They will not be deflected by the rich and powerful trying to do the same now. Mike Veale is doing a great job and should be congratulated for his courage.’
The disclosures come after several senior politicians dismissed the allegations against Heath as absurd and unfounded. Former Tory Foreign Secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind complained Heath’s reputation was being ‘besmirched’. Heath’s sexuality has been the source of much speculation over the years. Some believed he was gay, others said he was ‘asexual.’ At one point, he was being investigated by no fewer than five police forces – the Met, Wiltshire, Hampshire, Kent and Jersey.
The claims, some of which have been proved false, include alleged links to a convicted brothel keeper known as Madame Ling-Ling. A paedophile dossier compiled by Labour peer Baroness Castle said he offered young boys trips on his yacht, and in a separate incident one man claimed Sir Edward picked him up hitchhiking in Kent as a 12-year-old in the 1960s and lured him to his Mayfair flat.
Labour MP Tom Watson also said he had received allegations about Sir Edward. However the claims Mr Veale is investigating, which date from the 1960s to 1990s, are not linked to the discredited evidence of the man known as ‘Nick’, who alleged a high-level paedophile ring.
One of the key counter-claims made when the allegations first surfaced came from former Cabinet Secretary Lord Armstrong, who worked with Heath when he was Prime Minister. He said Heath ‘never drove a car’ and always had at least one policeman with him from 1970 until his death in 2005.
The fact that Sir Edward could drive was confirmed last night by a friend, who said the former Prime Minister bought a car in 1975, although Sir Edward was later given a chauffeur-driven car and police guard after IRA death threats.
Asked if Mr Veale believed the allegations against Sir Edward were ‘totally convincing’, a police spokesman said the Chief Constable was determined to ‘ensure the investigation is proportionate, measured and legal’ and that the job of the police was to ‘impartially investigate allegations without fear or favour and go where the evidence takes us. It is not the role of the police to judge the guilt or innocence of people in our criminal justice system.’
Further asked if Mr Veale had ‘120 per cent’ faith in the allegations, the spokesman declined to comment.
The Fail then follows up the article with this:
Police refuse to call off the dogs after VIP child sex ring fiasco
Launched in 2015 to investigate allegations against Sir Edward Heath, Operation Conifer has been dogged by claims that it traduces the reputation of a Prime Minister who died more than a decade ago and could not be put on trial.
The operation, which has a staff of 17 and has run up a bill approaching £1 million, did not get off to a good start when Wiltshire Chief Constable Mike Veale had to apologise for launching it in front of cameras outside Sir Edward’s former house, Arundells, in Salisbury.
Demands to call it off grew last November when Scotland Yard was forced to abandon its Operation Midland investigation into similar claims of a VIP paedophile ring in Westminster.
After a flurry of false accusations, Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe apologised to former Defence chief Lord Bramall, ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor, DJ Paul Gambaccini and Lady Brittan, widow of the late Lord Brittan.
Pressure on Operation Conifer mounted after this newspaper revealed how an expert, brought in by police to assess claims that Heath was linked to paedophiles who held satanic orgies, dismissed them as fantasy.
Days after The Mail on Sunday report, Mr Veale came out fighting and insisted Operation Conifer was not a ‘witch-hunt’.
In a surprise statement released on December 2, he said he refused to ‘buckle’ to demands to abandon the inquiry, and stressed his officers had not spoken to ‘Nick’, the man at the root of Operation Midland.
The Heath investigation was not a ‘fishing trip’, he said, adding that he was ‘duty-bound’ to go ahead with it ‘without fear or favour and go where the evidence takes us’.
He accused his critics of ignorance, and rebuked them for using ‘inappropriate and unacceptable pressure’ in an attempt to halt the inquiry.
Mr Veale said a ‘significant number of individuals’ had alleged abuse, but refused to say how many or give details of the only two people to be arrested.
He even said the findings of the investigation may never be made public, stating: ‘A confidential closing report will be written… and at that time I will take advice as to what I can legally put in the public domain.’
Police were ‘testing, checking and challenging the evidence and ensuring our approach is proportionate and justified’, he said.
Mr Veale argues that although Sir Edward died in 2005, other offenders may still be alive and victims could require support.
‘If the force had received allegations of non-recent child abuse against a former Prime Minister and done nothing, what would the reaction have been?’
Lincoln Seligman, Sir Edward’s godson, responded to Mr Veale’s December statement by saying: ‘If they have uncovered no evidence after 18 months they should say so.
And if Conifer is wound up, [Sir Edward] deserves to be exonerated as publicly as he was initially smeared. Shuffling the inquiry’s findings off into the night is not acceptable.’
Other aspects of Operation Conifer have also come under fire. Wiltshire Police interviewed key figures at Private Eye because the satirical magazine joked about unmarried Sir Edward’s sexuality 40 years ago.
They wanted to know if its nickname for him, ‘Sailor Ted’, in his days as PM from 1970 to 1974, was a reference to rumours that he was gay.
Police even asked current editor Ian Hislop what he knew about Heath, despite Hislop being a teenager during the period under investigation.
Officers have also tracked down former Downing Street staff to ask them if young men were ever sneaked into No 10.
Times writer and ex-Tory MP Matthew Parris dismissed the allegations, saying: ‘If Heath was a child abuser, I’m an aardvark.’
Nothing to see here….